{"id":156,"date":"2014-09-15T17:27:00","date_gmt":"2014-09-15T14:27:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/uusi.kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/?p=156"},"modified":"2021-04-09T12:16:23","modified_gmt":"2021-04-09T09:16:23","slug":"09-2014-paris-and-the-urban-values-of-hygiene","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/2014\/09\/15\/09-2014-paris-and-the-urban-values-of-hygiene\/","title":{"rendered":"09\/2014: Paris and the Urban Values of Hygiene"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In 2002, my belief that modernity was a vague concept whose hidden values needed to become explicit grew stronger when I wrote an essay on Modern architecture in France during the interwar period, for my communication at the Seventh DOCOMOMO Conference. Le Corbusier\u2019s gift for mediation overshadowed other talented architects and urban planners of his time, especially Auguste Perret. Unlike Le Corbusier, Perret advocated faithfulness to history. He was a protagonist of hygiene in housing architecture, as we can admire in the blocks he built in Le Havre after the Second World War: apartments are surrounded by natural light and air, the kitchens and bathrooms are remarkable standardized equipments, still in use. I thought that this wonderful urban achievement had a long history, which deserved new research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"500\" height=\"380\" src=\"http:\/\/uusi.kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Fabienne-Chevallier-120914.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-157\" srcset=\"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Fabienne-Chevallier-120914.jpg 500w, https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Fabienne-Chevallier-120914-300x228.jpg 300w, https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Fabienne-Chevallier-120914-16x12.jpg 16w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><figcaption><em>Fabienne Chevallier.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Still, that hygiene has a history that can be considered as a motor for social urban values is denied by Michel Foucault\u2019s followers. I won\u2019t discuss the formidable visionary talent of Foucault, nor the importance he paid rightly to the relations between knowledge and power. But Foucault\u2019s approach was sometimes biased by his strong belief that during the XIXth century, hygiene was used only for a disciplinary purpose. To his eyes, the function of modern architecture &#8211; for instance the modern hospitals &#8211; was to transform the individuals, and allow political control on them. The political use of hygiene paved the way for the future totalitarian regimes and their prison-like buildings. But even though hygienists had various ideologies including very conservative ones, there is no evidence showing that the modern city inspired by hygiene was a fruit of a proto-totalitarian political will. Sources show that a wide range of men tried to implement hygiene as a noble social concept.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In France the noble idea of hygiene was born in Paris long before it migrated in Le Havre. Hygiene was a science before it bore architectural and urban fruits. At the beginning of the XIXth century, hygiene took its roots within the disciplines of chemistry and medicine. When I decided to research the history of hygiene in Paris, I was fascinated with the idea that its urban architecture, which endured radical transformations during the Second Empire and the Third Republic, had perhaps more tribute to pay to science than to bureaucracy. Maybe Georges-Eug\u00e8ne Haussmann, the well-known, but also controversial \u201cpr\u00e9fet de la Seine\u201d (from 1853 until 1870), was not the unique champion of the modernization of Paris, and maybe modernization had different meanings even at his time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"500\" height=\"375\" src=\"http:\/\/uusi.kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Fab.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-158\" srcset=\"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Fab.jpg 500w, https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Fab-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Fab-16x12.jpg 16w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><figcaption><em>H\u00f4tel-Dieu, arch. Jacques \u00c9mile Gilbert et Arthur Diet (1865-1877), main courtyard. Photo F. Chevallier.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>When I begin a research, I appreciate the moment when I allow new questions to arise. The idea that, maybe, there had existed a wider circle of \u201cGreat Men\u201d bringing contributions to the transformations of Paris during the XIXth century, and that this circle comprised not only engineers &#8211; Eug\u00e8ne Belgrand and Adolphe Alphand\u2019s roles are well-known -, but also scientists, chemists, professors of medicine, politicians involved in hygiene as an asset for social progress, was a very appealing hypothesis. Sources revealed it was true. Modern Paris owes a lot to the theories of hygiene elaborated since the beginning of the XIXth century.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Before the time of Napoleon III and Haussmann, hygiene in urban architecture resulted in the new markets and slaughterhouses designed by Louis Bruy\u00e8re (they were all built in the 1820\u2019s), masterpieces of classical architecture made more simple and rational. The H\u00f4tel-Dieu (Paris main hospital in the Ile de la Cit\u00e9) by architect Jacques \u00c9mile Gilbert, is a beautiful building with an inner courtyard inspired by Renaissance architecture. Its conception was a late example of the theory of pavilion architecture, which followed principles of hygiene according to the theory of miasmas. Hygiene was the dominant quality of the buildings designed for schools. It inspired the use of modern materials and functional architectural details. Those schools were considered as an architectural success of the social policy during the Third Republic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That Haussman\u2019s oeuvre was part of a longer urban history showing prolific relations between science (especially medicine) and architecture brings a different perspective on the understanding of modern Paris. It also brings to the fore that hygiene and its own ethics inspired various forms of architectural beauty, which the H\u00f4tel-Dieu in Paris can be a good example of.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>15.9.2014<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fabienne Chevallier<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fabienne Chevallier&#8217;s web page: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fabiennechevallier.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">http:\/\/www.fabiennechevallier.com<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fabienne Chevallier has published<em> Le Paris moderne : histoire des politiques d\u2019hygi\u00e8ne (1855-1898) (2010) <\/em>and<em> La naissance du Paris moderne : l\u2019essor des politiques d\u2019hygi\u00e8ne (1788-1855)<\/em><br>(Online book, 2012 : <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bium.univ-paris5.fr\/histmed\/asclepiades\/pdf\/chevallier_2009.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">http:\/\/www.bium.univ-paris5.fr\/histmed\/asclepiades\/pdf\/chevallier_2009.pdf<\/a>. ).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Le Paris moderne<\/em> won the Prize of the French Society of History of Medicine (2010) and the Prize Jean-Fran\u00e7ois Coste of the National Academy of Medicine (2011).<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In 2002, my belief that modernity was a vague concept whose hidden values needed to become explicit grew stronger when I wrote an essay on Modern architecture in France during the interwar period, for my communication at the Seventh DOCOMOMO Conference. Le Corbusier\u2019s gift for mediation overshadowed other talented architects and urban planners of his &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/2014\/09\/15\/09-2014-paris-and-the-urban-values-of-hygiene\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8221;09\/2014: Paris and the Urban Values of Hygiene&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":""},"categories":[8,5],"tags":[6],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=156"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":160,"href":"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156\/revisions\/160"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kaupunkitutkimuksenseura.fi\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}